*NEW* Bengals/Jaguars Trade

This was originally one big trade broken into 2 parts because splff was retarded and needed to evaluate it in some strange way. So I guess it's 2 trades now lol.

#1

Bengals Trade:
RE Jamaal Anderson (81)
CB Dre Kirkpatrick (78)
WR Brandon Tate (71)

Jaguars Trade:
HB Maurice Jones-Drew (94)
______________________________________________________________________________
#2

Bengals Trade:
2013 1st Round Pick (25)
2013 2nd Round Pick (53)
2013 3rd Round Pick (89)
2014 2nd Round Pick (??)
2014 3rd Round Pick (??)

Jaguars Trade:
2013 1st Round Pick (3)
2014 7th Round Pick (??)

Much better trade for MJD.

I vote yes for the jones drew part of the trade. No on the picks part. I think the no 3 overall pick in the draft deserves a lil more. The 1 and 2 are fine but the 3rd pick needs to be higher than a 6th IMO. The 6th round is full of throw away picks. Change it to 3 or 4 and you have my vote for that too.

Trade has been updated.

Shooter wrote:There are two trades here since some don't like big trades.

#1

Bengals Trade:
RE Jamaal Anderson (81)
CB Dre Kirkpatrick (78)
WR Ben Tate (71)

Jaguars Trade:
HB Maurice Jones-Drew (94)
______________________________________________________________________________
#2

Bengals Trade:
2013 1st Round Pick (25)
2013 2nd Round Pick (53)
2013 3rd Round Pick (89)
2014 2nd Round Pick (??)
2014 3rd Round Pick (??)

Jaguars Trade:
2013 1st Round Pick (3rd)

I see this as one trade, which as a whole is a fair trade for me. I accept it in the form of two trades.

Sure

Ok this is better. I think it's still heavily in favor of shooter and I'm kinda on the fence about this, but I'm gonna go ahead and hesitantly vote yes. After talking to Hooch last night, it seemed like he wasn't gonna make this trade, but I guess he changed his mind. I know every trade isn't gonna be one for one on value, but this one is right at the limit for me. You just barely squeaked by with a yes.

Yes

I agree to the new deal (with the 2014 7th)...As a WHOLE the trade works out to be pretty much even.

I'm ok for the player trade, not for the pick trade. #3 overall pick worth way more than 3 picks in the back of each round.

And if this is really "one deal" then I vote no because it is multiple trades, players involved, and think that puts shooter over the limit.