GRINDERS

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+8
Jaredlib
stoptherun
dclark44
urbanslegend05
jhawk886
getonmylevelho
jusblaze09
splff3000
12 posters

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    stoptherun
    stoptherun


    Posts : 1742
    Reputation : 3
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 112

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by stoptherun Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:10 pm

    Jared u said something golden in an earlier post. What if we lower the recruiting difficulty? Maybe then other schools could nab some more 5 stars and the CPU wouldn't cheat so bad with teams like bama.
    Jaredlib
    Jaredlib


    Posts : 5695
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-11-27
    Age : 74
    Location : afganistan

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Jaredlib Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:11 pm

    I really think that makes sense. User vs user is still the same.level but ser vs.cpu should be less.stacked
    jhawk886
    jhawk886


    Posts : 2724
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 35
    Location : Kansas

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by jhawk886 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:11 pm

    Jaredlib wrote:I still disagree with usc on that list but I agree that changes are needed
    I know that right now you're not a recruiting power but that's because of a bunch of down years before you took the reins. If you got their pitches back up to A's and A+'s across the board, you would be just like UF and UT. The main schools in the 3 big recruiting states get huge advantages. Ohio State has a slight advantage as well but Rauloe just hasn't gotten his team good enough yet to reap those benefits.
    stoptherun
    stoptherun


    Posts : 1742
    Reputation : 3
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 112

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by stoptherun Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:12 pm

    Totally cool with no 6* schools to start in 12. But I think we're getting ahead of ourselves cuz recruiting might be totally different on the next game.
    dclark44
    dclark44


    Posts : 2373
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 101

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by dclark44 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:14 pm

    Gotta build your school up and let them recruit for a season. Very Happy
    Jaredlib
    Jaredlib


    Posts : 5695
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-11-27
    Age : 74
    Location : afganistan

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Jaredlib Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:15 pm

    I think ea.servers are a little messed up right now.
    Jaredlib
    Jaredlib


    Posts : 5695
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-11-27
    Age : 74
    Location : afganistan

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Jaredlib Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:17 pm

    I just don't get why my pitches aren't going up in some.areas

    Man my ps3 is acting funny....
    jhawk886
    jhawk886


    Posts : 2724
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 35
    Location : Kansas

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by jhawk886 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:19 pm

    I would be reluctant to reduce the recruiting difficulty because then anyone we compete for against the CPU we will probably win. Given that we now have recruiting limits that isn't as much of a problem but it will still reduce the level of competition CPU teams can field.

    The main problem isn't the CPU teams' recruiting ability. Yeah teams like Bama are just total bullshit but that's an outlier. If we want to change then that's fine, but then none of us will probably ever lose to CPU teams again.
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:20 pm

    stoptherun wrote:Totally cool with no 6* schools to start in 12. But I think we're getting ahead of ourselves cuz recruiting might be totally different on the next game.

    Yeah, let's wait and see what happens first before we make rules for 12 lol. Hawk, it's not so easy to find replacements this late in the game. As you prolly can tell, i'm having a hard time finding replacements for Blaze and Osama. If you and stop quit as well that could prolly doom the OD, I say we run a few more seasons then close up shop for 12. I'm definitely trading this in towards to 12 so I'm not playing all the way until 12 releases, but a few more seasons and we can chill out. That way, we can get that "urge" again. I don't know. I'm just talking out my ass, but I think there is some validity to what I'm saying. I say we go to late may/early june then close up shop.
    stoptherun
    stoptherun


    Posts : 1742
    Reputation : 3
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 112

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by stoptherun Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:22 pm

    jhawk886 wrote:I would be reluctant to reduce the recruiting difficulty because then anyone we compete for against the CPU we will probably win. Given that we now have recruiting limits that isn't as much of a problem but it will still reduce the level of competition CPU teams can field.

    The main problem isn't the CPU teams' recruiting ability. Yeah teams like Bama are just total bullshit but that's an outlier. If we want to change then that's fine, but then none of us will probably ever lose to CPU teams again.

    If we drop down to a hard cap of 70 and also limit 5* signings the CPU should still get their talent. More probably.
    Jaredlib
    Jaredlib


    Posts : 5695
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-11-27
    Age : 74
    Location : afganistan

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Jaredlib Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:22 pm

    Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:23 pm

    jhawk886 wrote:I would be reluctant to reduce the recruiting difficulty because then anyone we compete for against the CPU we will probably win. Given that we now have recruiting limits that isn't as much of a problem but it will still reduce the level of competition CPU teams can field.

    The main problem isn't the CPU teams' recruiting ability. Yeah teams like Bama are just total bullshit but that's an outlier. If we want to change then that's fine, but then none of us will probably ever lose to CPU teams again.

    Naw, i don't think we should reduce recruiting difficulty. It's not the cpu recruiting thats the problem. It's the recruits choices of schools.
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:24 pm

    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    dclark44
    dclark44


    Posts : 2373
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 101

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by dclark44 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:25 pm

    splff3000 wrote:
    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    I take offense to this
    jhawk886
    jhawk886


    Posts : 2724
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 35
    Location : Kansas

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by jhawk886 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:26 pm

    Jaredlib wrote:I just don't get why my pitches aren't going up in some.areas

    Man my ps3 is acting funny....
    In general anywhere from 3-5 pitches are changed after a given year, If you have some A+'s though, that reduces the likelihood of having 4 or 5 things go up though because it's random which pitches go up and an A+ can be selected to go up, but it can't actually go up at all so you're SOL. I had my academic prestige go down last year. That just doesn't make any sense. I don't see Notre Dame ever losing prestige as far as academics go. It just really sucks the way they handle recruiting in general; actual recruits, recruiting pitches, prestige, etc. It just isn't realistic. Hell, as I said earlier, given EA's own prestige system's rules, Texas in 2012 should be 5*s, but they won't be because they are Texas and they actually should still be 6*s. How fluid they make some things and how static some other things are is just ridiculous. They really need to address this in next years game but I just don't see it happening.
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:30 pm

    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    I take offense to this

    lol, you would.
    stoptherun
    stoptherun


    Posts : 1742
    Reputation : 3
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 112

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by stoptherun Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:30 pm

    Damn wisconsin and Penn state don't play each other.
    Jaredlib
    Jaredlib


    Posts : 5695
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-11-27
    Age : 74
    Location : afganistan

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Jaredlib Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:31 pm

    I think stop just nailed it. Change the limit and lower the diff. Spliff with lower diff their choice.of.school can change in ur favor easier
    dclark44
    dclark44


    Posts : 2373
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 101

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by dclark44 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:31 pm

    splff3000 wrote:
    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    I take offense to this

    lol, you would.
    Enjoy possibly winning the Iron Bowl this year splff, cause once I'm back in, ain't happening
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:35 pm

    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    I take offense to this

    lol, you would.
    Enjoy possibly winning the Iron Bowl this year splff, cause once I'm back in, ain't happening

    Thangs done changed man. i got some boys in here now. I ain't at Alabama level, but i ain't scrub level anymore lol. Having said that, your 99's would prolly still dog my boys. We'll see next season though.

    In light of what's happening in the Big 10, I too think we should change to 3 user games so we can schedule more cpu opponents. Especially since it looks like Jared is in the pac 10 by himself now.
    jhawk886
    jhawk886


    Posts : 2724
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 35
    Location : Kansas

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by jhawk886 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:38 pm

    splff3000 wrote:
    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    dclark44 wrote:
    splff3000 wrote:
    Jaredlib wrote:Hawk I think that's better than us getting.hosed by cpu

    Only team that cheats is Bama.
    I take offense to this

    lol, you would.
    Enjoy possibly winning the Iron Bowl this year splff, cause once I'm back in, ain't happening

    Thangs done changed man. i got some boys in here now. I ain't at Alabama level, but i ain't scrub level anymore lol. Having said that, your 99's would prolly still dog my boys. We'll see next season though.

    In light of what's happening in the Big 10, I too think we should change to 3 user games so we can schedule more cpu opponents. Especially since it looks like Jared is in the pac 10 by himself now.
    Jared may go to Penn State though. If that happens we should be fine.
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:39 pm

    Looks like another new guy from OS has registered for the boards. Will he be the first one to say something or is he gonna register and disappear like the other guys? He can take Osama's spot. Then with Clark coming back next season we can have 12 users again.
    Rauloe
    Rauloe


    Posts : 451
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-09-25
    Location : Nashville TN

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Rauloe Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:39 pm

    6'6" OLB with 4:36 Speed? WTF is that all about ? Damn i thought Penn State and Wisconsin played each this year. Guess i shud have made sum 3rd down stops against the Badgers.
    dclark44
    dclark44


    Posts : 2373
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 101

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by dclark44 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:40 pm

    splff3000 wrote:Looks like another new guy from OS has registered for the boards. Will he be the first one to say something or is he gonna register and disappear like the other guys? He can take Osama's spot. Then with Clark coming back next season we can have 12 users again.

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 AlabamaWOW
    splff3000
    splff3000


    Posts : 6181
    Reputation : 12
    Join date : 2010-08-23
    Age : 45

    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by splff3000 Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:41 pm

    Rauloe wrote:6'6" OLB with 4:36 Speed? WTF is that all about ? Damn i thought Penn State and Wisconsin played each this year. Guess i shud have made sum 3rd down stops against the Badgers.

    Who is that? That mfer ain't on my board lol.

    Sponsored content


    Rivals 2011 Dynasty - Page 19 Empty Re: Rivals 2011 Dynasty

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:03 pm