Workers 2012 Team List

oops%

Just talked to hawk and he of course is taking Kansas so that settles all the teams.

Ok i have sent out the invited but it wouldnt let me add zeph or joker because it said they dont have a account so when yall get straight let me know so i can send the invites and if anybody didnt get theres let me know

zehp is rdy

Ok i sent it

I don't even know if you have my psn...it's uncleLEO12

my bad i didnt lol i just sent the invite

looking forward to seeing whats gonna happen in here. Oh and Pead is a bad mfer in real life too.

yea and these 3 star teams got some really good guys cinnci got a good QB and RB so im wondering whats going on over there and man i can see now being a 2 star team is no joke lol

yungjswag89 wrote:yea and these 3 star teams got some really good guys cinnci got a good QB and RB so im wondering whats going on over there and man i can see now being a 2 star team is no joke lol

yeah looks like i got a pretty damn good 1, 2 punch at RB at Miss. St too... just no depth, at all... and if recruiting doesnt pan out like i hope, it could get uglier

Also , i realize I'm in the minority here, but just for the record, I wouldn't mind AA recruiting either. I've seen CPU teams do some crazy shit on heisman . And that was with VT. But either way i'll deal.

Well I can vouch that you aren't a recruiting guy. lol. You spend Prolly the least amount of time recruiting as anyone in here lol.

splff3000 wrote:Well I can vouch that you aren't a recruiting guy. lol. You spend Prolly the least amount of time recruiting as anyone in here lol.

That's not true at all... But when you have a 400 point lead and a sift commit , and the next week the CPU jumps up and signs the guy, its a little farcical... Plus you're guaging me against the time you spend, I apparently read a little faster or process information a little more quickly or whatever, but you are overly anal. Anyway I'm not the only or first person to say this.

KidIcarus27 wrote:

splff3000 wrote:Well I can vouch that you aren't a recruiting guy. lol. You spend Prolly the least amount of time recruiting as anyone in here lol.

That's not true at all... But when you have a 400 point lead and a sift commit , and the next week the CPU jumps up and signs the guy, its a little farcical... Plus you're guaging me against the time you spend, I apparently read a little faster or process information a little more quickly or whatever, but you are overly anal. Anyway I'm not the only or first person to say this.

I've been wanting to use this smiley for a minute now and while this isn't quite the situation for it, its close enough. So on that note.........

Kid, you and I just became best fuckin buds brother.

I've been screaming on these forums for AA recruiting the last 5 months. Heisman, like you said, lets the CPU get away with weird, unrealistic shit.

I am with Kid on this one. But yes, we are the minority.

Jaredlib wrote:Kid, you and I just became best fuckin buds brother.

I've been screaming on these forums for AA recruiting the last 5 months. Heisman, like you said, lets the CPU get away with weird, unrealistic shit.

I am with Kid on this one. But yes, we are the minority.

You know I'm gonna be honest. I don't think its the setting at all. I think some people just can recruit and others can't. I went from auburn all the way to 3* cal and turned them into a power with recruiting. Jhawk turned shitty nd into a national champion with recruiting. Yungj had uga on the right track and getting better with recruiting. You had usc in California and couldn't recruit. That's supposed to be cake. I know kids problem but I won't put it out there. I think you may need to evaluate your recruiting strategy at some point. That's just my opinion. I'm not trying to slam you or nothing.

well like is said i will change it if crazy stuff start happeneing