This vote will be majority rules because I can't decide. Voting will end tonight 7-10 at midnight. Do you guys wanna go with 4 users in 3 conferences, 3 users in 4 conferences, or the new idea of 2 users in six? Please vote on this ASAP. Hopefully we will be starting this league on wednesday or Thursday.
+5
chugg18
Jbrax1122
Errig
mrdinknose
dipsh
9 posters
League vote
dipsh- Posts : 1815
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 47
Location : Utah
mrdinknose- Posts : 243
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-04-06
2 in 6
Errig- Posts : 479
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-09-01
Age : 32
Location : New Jersey
3 In 4
Last edited by Errig on Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Jbrax1122- Posts : 344
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-06-25
Age : 37
4-3 I think it would make conference battles more exciting...
dipsh- Posts : 1815
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 47
Location : Utah
I vote 3 in 4
chugg18- Posts : 375
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-04-19
Age : 39
Location : Northern Utah
2-6
Jbrax1122- Posts : 344
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-06-25
Age : 37
3-4 would be my second vote.
Jaredlib- Posts : 5695
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-11-27
Age : 74
Location : afganistan
lol....
holy shit.
You guys knlow I think about all this shit way too much so its hard for me to just pick one.
4 in 3 would definitely be wild....I like that idea because with 3 in-conference games shit wouldnt get all whacky with schedules, you could still keep CPU out of conference rivalries and stuff like that
3 in 4 is kinda the same, you would only need 1 out of conference user game and we would be a litle more spread out.
2 in 6 is intriguing to me....I think the problem with that one is when someone drops out (as I am sure a couple new guys on here will) it leaves that other person alone unless we specifically fill that spot. The only thing I don't like about 2 in 6 is it would be like the old Rivals where everyone has to play two years right off the bat in week one and week 2 and you get some unrealistic machups down the road. I like the ebb and flow of a realistic schedule, don't need to be playing BCS title type games in week one and two and then 13 straight weeks of nothing exciting. More spread out the better IMO as far as schedules
I was kinda hopin to get NCST because NU has the shittiest corners I have ever seen and in this game corners actually matter (which I LOVE), but I won't be selfish, so I vote for 3 in 4, since it is the most balanced choice. That would mean, if voted, I would have to stay in the B1G, but, oh well.
Dips, not to derail this thread, but a quick question. Are you looking to avoid custom conferences? If so I understand completely. If not, maybe a guy like me who isn't really invested in any of the 3* teams available could pick one from outside and get moved in? I understand if thats a hassle you want to avoid, just let me know, NU or Purdue will be fine to start with.
holy shit.
You guys knlow I think about all this shit way too much so its hard for me to just pick one.
4 in 3 would definitely be wild....I like that idea because with 3 in-conference games shit wouldnt get all whacky with schedules, you could still keep CPU out of conference rivalries and stuff like that
3 in 4 is kinda the same, you would only need 1 out of conference user game and we would be a litle more spread out.
2 in 6 is intriguing to me....I think the problem with that one is when someone drops out (as I am sure a couple new guys on here will) it leaves that other person alone unless we specifically fill that spot. The only thing I don't like about 2 in 6 is it would be like the old Rivals where everyone has to play two years right off the bat in week one and week 2 and you get some unrealistic machups down the road. I like the ebb and flow of a realistic schedule, don't need to be playing BCS title type games in week one and two and then 13 straight weeks of nothing exciting. More spread out the better IMO as far as schedules
I was kinda hopin to get NCST because NU has the shittiest corners I have ever seen and in this game corners actually matter (which I LOVE), but I won't be selfish, so I vote for 3 in 4, since it is the most balanced choice. That would mean, if voted, I would have to stay in the B1G, but, oh well.
Dips, not to derail this thread, but a quick question. Are you looking to avoid custom conferences? If so I understand completely. If not, maybe a guy like me who isn't really invested in any of the 3* teams available could pick one from outside and get moved in? I understand if thats a hassle you want to avoid, just let me know, NU or Purdue will be fine to start with.
Last edited by Jaredlib on Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
PalmettoTiger- Posts : 123
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-06-24
3-4. I've never played an OD, but the fun to me is squaring off against other human players for conference titles, new rivalries, etc. I can play the computer and do an offline dynasty on my own. The more interaction without overkill the better.
IUcookie- Posts : 296
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-06-24
Location : INDIANA
anything but 2 in 6
dipsh- Posts : 1815
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 47
Location : Utah
Jared's point about what if someone bails and we only have two per conference is a very good one. With 6 votes already going to 3 in 4 odds are we will end up there.
As far as switching teams conferences, I don't love it. Do you like any big east teams? Someone awhile back said their number two choice was Minnesota? We could switch them? I'd just have to look back and find who it was that posted that.
As far as switching teams conferences, I don't love it. Do you like any big east teams? Someone awhile back said their number two choice was Minnesota? We could switch them? I'd just have to look back and find who it was that posted that.
dipsh- Posts : 1815
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 47
Location : Utah
It was Reggie. He may still be ok with switching?
Errig- Posts : 479
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-09-01
Age : 32
Location : New Jersey
I can make the switch to any conference man, if anyone doesnt want to leave thier team and we need someone to move ill do it. I dont have my heart set on any team
Jaredlib- Posts : 5695
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-11-27
Age : 74
Location : afganistan
Dips im cool with NU, ill make it work. Gotta love wearing purple anyway
mrdinknose- Posts : 243
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-04-06
Lookin through all the posts and reading shit I want to change my vote to 3 in 4 conf. That seems best
dipsh- Posts : 1815
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 47
Location : Utah
OK. That settles it. We are going with the teams we have got now. Leggo!
Errig- Posts : 479
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-09-01
Age : 32
Location : New Jersey
dipsh wrote:OK. That settles it. We are going with the teams we have got now. Leggo!
I like that! LEGGGGGO
SkillzKillz719- Posts : 101
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-06-26
Location : Oregon
Yup glad it came to that!
I would have voted 3 in 4. I have a feeling one or two will drop out. For whatever reason.
And it just makes it 1 user non conference game.
I would have voted 3 in 4. I have a feeling one or two will drop out. For whatever reason.
And it just makes it 1 user non conference game.
|
|
|