Stat Padding

Alright let's break down the numbers for those of you who don't know since according to hawk I'm apparently a stat padder just like stoptherun.

My game:
AJ Green - 17 catches, 305 yards, 3 touchdowns.
Andy Dalton - 29 completions, 569 yards, 4 touchdowns (1 in fourth quarter).
AJ Green had 59% of Dalton's completions, 54% of his yards, 75% of his TD's.
Bengals as a team had 18 rushing attempts, 2 rushing touchdowns (in 4th qtr)
______________________________________________________________________________

Stop's game:
Julio Jones - 19 catches, 349 yards, 3 touchdowns.
Vince Young - 25 completions, 418 yards, 3 touchdowns.
J. Jones had 76% of Young's completions, 92% of his yards, 100% of his TD's.
Falcons as a team had 5 rushes, 0 rushing touchdowns
**Only 1 rush was with a HB, the other 4 were with Vince Young. Probably because Julio Jones wasn't open that play**

______________________________________________________________________________

I honestly don't understand how I can be grouped in with someone who blatantly tried to stat pad the whole entire game.

Rushing attempts really shouldnt matter IMO. A case of stat padding can be made for you though shooter.

I really don't see it.

He had 2 more catches and more yards, but Green still was targeted a lot.

You obviously don't get what I'm saying.

Damn sure looks like stat padding to me. It's not as egregious as Stop, but still looks like Stat padding. There is no way you're gonna make me believe you have to throw the ball to AJ Green 17 times in a cpu game.

Yeah just because Stop set the bar so high, doesn't mean this isn't stat padding.

Def not a sim game.

I think this is a stupid discussion. I feel like you should know that almost 600 yards through the air is kind of ridiculous. It may happen in real life, but in there has only been one QB all season in the NFL that even surpassed 400 yards. That guy being Drew Brees when he threw for 446 against the Packers with 35 completions and 54 attempts. I don't have as much of a problem with your WR, but more of a problem with the playcalling. To rack up 569 yards, there would have to be some sort of "money play" that you were able to run that picked you up a lot of yardage. 20 yards per pass completion is an insane number. The best QB's in the NFL right now are averaging around 8 yards per pass completion. The only one reaching double digits in a game was Eli Manning at 10.19... All I'm saying is, if we're going for realism, a 569 yard game on only 29 completions is far from realistic.

A hit dog will holler.

stoptherun wrote:A hit dog will holler.

LMFAO!!! I am laughing so fucking hard right now. I don't really know why, but this shit seems like such a funny ass response. Give it up shooter. At least stop admitted that it was over the top. You're still in denial. Just give it up. I'm gonna have some real serious talks with the commish about this shit. Season 1, a lot of people got freebies with regards to stat padding. Me and the commish are gonna figure out some kinda way to legislate this. It feels kinda like a witch hunt, but unlike in Salem, there really is some stat padding going on here. My best advice for you in the future is to not even put yourself in the situation to get questioned.

Maybe it's just early and my brain isn't working, but I'm not seeing this game. What game is it?

so far there been about 4 stat padded games.. come on guys we play with 28 users just because you cant put up numbers against user dont mean u can abuse cpu...its one thing if you need a couple hundred yards in in last games..but its another when its blantant like the last few...for me if you stat pad you automatically lose the right to play a game for the next week...so pretty much if you stat pad crazy one game against the cpu ..guess what the user game you have next week your ass will be auto and the other user plays your team cpu...don't like them biscuits don't stat pad bitches

Sinister wrote:so far there been about 4 stat padded games.. come on guys we play with 28 users just because you cant put up numbers against user dont mean u can abuse cpu...its one thing if you need a couple hundred yards in in last games..but its another when its blantant like the last few...for me if you stat pad you automatically lose the right to play a game for the next week...so pretty much if you stat pad crazy one game against the cpu ..guess what the user game you have next week your ass will be auto and the other user plays your team cpu...don't like them biscuits don't stat pad bitches

I like this rule much better than the "lose a 3rd round pick" rule. At least this is something the commissioner can control. I like this alot, sin. I'll pass it on to Hawk if he haven't seen it yet.

Aftershock9958 wrote:Maybe it's just early and my brain isn't working, but I'm not seeing this game. What game is it?

Yeah it was earlier this year. It's his game against the Giants.

splff3000 wrote:

I like this rule much better than the "lose a 3rd round pick" rule. At least this is something the commissioner can control. I like this alot, sin. I'll pass it on to Hawk if he haven't seen it yet.

Yeah, unless the user is losing on purpose to begin with

tmjohns18 wrote:

splff3000 wrote:

I like this rule much better than the "lose a 3rd round pick" rule. At least this is something the commissioner can control. I like this alot, sin. I'll pass it on to Hawk if he haven't seen it yet.

Yeah, unless the user is losing on purpose to begin with

Good point TJ.

tmjohns18 wrote:

splff3000 wrote:

I like this rule much better than the "lose a 3rd round pick" rule. At least this is something the commissioner can control. I like this alot, sin. I'll pass it on to Hawk if he haven't seen it yet.

Yeah, unless the user is losing on purpose to begin with

Nice tj lmao