Week 13! Chugg vs Dink

SkillzKillz719 wrote:Hey, Dipsh or anyone on right now can you please go look at my activity?

I'm up 24-17 right now at the start of the 3rd quarter.
It froze. Not internet connection just froze. Some one please verify this. And infact, I took a picture of it just now.

This sucks. But oh well. Can I get a word back on some one real fast so I can carry on with my night?
Ugh.

If no one answers in 10, I'll text one of you.

Just so everyone knows Skillz sent me a pic of him up 24-17 so it's legit.

hey just a thought and suggestion... when some of the new guys come in to replace rutgers and conn, if they dont pic those exact teams up skillz can stay with usf and you could move him to the sec or acc if they decide to pick teams in those conferences.

I have a question too. Will pitt and cuse move to the acc and boise to the big east? The big east also lost their orange bowl tie in for next season. Won't matter for skillz though as he can easily get an at large bid. Just curious on how we arrange to fit what is on the horizon.

Palmetto yes if we could advance today you could (possibly) do the offseason online when you are gone

IUcookie wrote:Palmetto yes if we could advance today you could (possibly) do the offseason online when you are gone

I wish. We still have conf championships and bowl games after the last week.

Might actually work out perfectly as I'm behind asu in conference play. You guys can do championship week while I'm gone. I can play my bowl game on Thursday and we're off to season 2.

I posted on OS for some replacements. Is anyone interested in switching teams in the offseason? My opinion is we stay the same (3 in 4) and we schedule everyone a minimum of 5 user games if possible.

I cool with whatever, but I think more people in each confrenence is more fun. I say atleast we do 4 teams in 3 but my vote is still 6-2... I will roll with whatever the majority vote is but I think this season hit a bump when we have a bunch on computer games in a row so if we have more people in the same if will keep it interesting throughout the season. Not trying to argue, that's just my opinion.

I don't want to change anything from what we voted on at the beginning. 3 teams in 4 conf with 3 user games. I thought that is why we voted

Jbrax1122 wrote:I cool with whatever, but I think more people in each confrenence is more fun. I say atleast we do 4 teams in 3 but my vote is still 6-2... I will roll with whatever the majority vote is but I think this season hit a bump when we have a bunch on computer games in a row so if we have more people in the same if will keep it interesting throughout the season. Not trying to argue, that's just my opinion.

I think we can get 5 or 6 user games without making anyone switch teams or doing weird conf re alignments to make it work. I don't hear anyone wanting to switch teams.

That's cool too, i would feel better if I knew all 12 users would stay in. My conf battle was a 2 man race this season. I think it would e better if that 3rd user was still in and played me for the conf championship. But yeah all non conf games vs users should be fun.

I mean we have been through thick and thin with the teams we have now, if i had to switch i would need to know the exceptions.... 3 star again? 4 star the highest? No team over a 90 overall? Cause if i had to switch it would be the university of washington in the pac 12 or. Whatever works best with what can be achieved to your standards

Or even penn st

Looks like all we have is Errig and reggie left