Rivals 2011 Dynasty

ehicks009 wrote:i vote yes to raising pass block, and pass defense if necessary... btw spliff you didnt actually vote

dclark44 wrote:I vote yes too. I play with bama and play action isn't even an option when I play. One of the best lines in the league too

pops21kid wrote:I vote yes.

jhawk886 wrote:A most resounding yes. Although, you do realize, this means wa-that Notre Dame will never lose another game. lol.

NY_Eer wrote:

jhawk886 wrote:A most resounding yes. Although, you do realize, this means wa-that Notre Dame will never lose another game. lol.

Yes

splff3000 wrote:
Because I don't care either way. It looks like the pass blocking is gonna be raised though.

urbanslegend05 wrote:Actually, you guys still need one more, but I'm sure we're going to get that, so the question now is, how much should we bump it up?

5, 10, 15? I want input or it's not going to change.

jhawk886 wrote:I would bump up pass block 5, and bump CPU pass rush down 5. To make it USER Pass Block 10, CPU Pass Rush 5. That would be the same as it is in Workers and I think the CPU generated pass rush in that dynasty feels about right.

splff3000 wrote:

jhawk886 wrote:I would bump up pass block 5, and bump CPU pass rush down 5. To make it USER Pass Block 10, CPU Pass Rush 5. That would be the same as it is in Workers and I think the CPU generated pass rush in that dynasty feels about right.

Yeah, but the thing about Workers is that the user teams are not as good as they are over here. I say bump up pass blocking to 10 for now but leave pass rush alone. If there continues to be a problem, then lower cpu pass rush to 5. One thing I've found out about tweaking sliders is that you don't wanna make too many adjustments that affect the same area(cpu pass rush in this case) at once. You could over shoot the sweet spot and have to make more adjustments backwards. So I say adjust the pass block, but wait on the cpu pass rush.

jhawk886 wrote:
Well, that is true for most of our teams. But Notre Dame is actually worse than Kansas is at the moment lol. But that's all good. We should be quite a bit better next year and I'll start to get the program back on the right track. I suppose we can go up just 5 on PB but I still think they will get too much pressure. I would adjust them to the Wrokers sliders and then bump up CPU pass defense a significant amount, maybe 15 points, to compensate. But we can try incremental adjustments to see how it goes.

NY_Eer wrote:

Rauloe wrote:Did that... Ive added him but not online.. Everybody helse add me to their list.. (RAULOE50)

I don't think I can play tonight...just unloaded a shit load of furniture and have a meeting tomorrow. Thought I was off to unpack, but forgot about the meeting.

Rauloe, can you play tomorrow night?

Rauloe wrote:

NY_Eer wrote:

Rauloe wrote:Did that... Ive added him but not online.. Everybody helse add me to their list.. (RAULOE50)

I don't think I can play tonight...just unloaded a shit load of furniture and have a meeting tomorrow. Thought I was off to unpack, but forgot about the meeting.

Rauloe, can you play tomorrow night?

I can be on tonite.. Just let me know what time, or if im not online, shoot a msg to Rauloe50@msn.com.. i shud not be too far out

urbanslegend05 wrote:
Rauloe,
best thing to do is to check the board as often as possible when you have a user game scheduled. I noticed last night that both of you were online within 7 minutes of each other, so it would have been possible to set up.
Also, it's good to give everyone a basic schedule for when you'll be available, such as, I would be good between 7-11 p.m. Then you know around what times you should be checking the board or psn.
A few of us exchange cell phone #'s as well so that we can text when setting up a game. I find this works the best for me and I know more than a few of us have each others numbers.

splff3000 wrote:

urbanslegend05 wrote:
Rauloe,
best thing to do is to check the board as often as possible when you have a user game scheduled. I noticed last night that both of you were online within 7 minutes of each other, so it would have been possible to set up.
Also, it's good to give everyone a basic schedule for when you'll be available, such as, I would be good between 7-11 p.m. Then you know around what times you should be checking the board or psn.
A few of us exchange cell phone #'s as well so that we can text when setting up a game. I find this works the best for me and I know more than a few of us have each others numbers.

im gonna try to get it scheduled tonite to play him.. we been in contact and hopefully we cud advance tonite..
Yeah, NYer asked me to give Rauloe his number already.

OK, now I got a totally unrelated question. I just saw that the Big East is trying to get TCU to join their conference. My question is, does anyone know why the Big 12 isn't trying to get TCU and Boise to join the Big 12 to replace Nebraska and Colorado? It seems like it makes sense geographically which can't be said for TCU going to the Big East. Anyway, I was just curious about that and was wondering if maybe one of you might have any insight. Jhawk this seems like it's your backyard. Do you have any insight?

splff3000 wrote:

urbanslegend05 wrote:
Rauloe,
best thing to do is to check the board as often as possible when you have a user game scheduled. I noticed last night that both of you were online within 7 minutes of each other, so it would have been possible to set up.
Also, it's good to give everyone a basic schedule for when you'll be available, such as, I would be good between 7-11 p.m. Then you know around what times you should be checking the board or psn.
A few of us exchange cell phone #'s as well so that we can text when setting up a game. I find this works the best for me and I know more than a few of us have each others numbers.

Yeah, NYer asked me to give Rauloe his number already.

OK, now I got a totally unrelated question. I just saw that the Big East is trying to get TCU to join their conference. My question is, does anyone know why the Big 12 isn't trying to get TCU and Boise to join the Big 12 to replace Nebraska and Colorado? It seems like it makes sense geographically which can't be said for TCU going to the Big East. Anyway, I was just curious about that and was wondering if maybe one of you might have any insight. Jhawk this seems like it's your backyard. Do you have any insight?

jhawk886 wrote:
As far as the Big 12 getting TCU and Boise, there are two main reasons why it won't happen. #1 Texas rules the conference, and they don't want another Texas school to join the mix. Boise would add another potential contender to the league which could threaten Texas's postseason placement if they have to play in the championship game. While both of these are somewhat important, the main reason is that neither school has that big of a fan base, especially nationwide. It would be two more teams to split the pot with who probably wouldn't provide an equal amount of money or increased exposure to the league. In addition, this way, the winner of the Red River Rivalry has a very good chance to make the NC every year as long as they take care of business. The #2 reason is that Dan Beebe (the Big 12 Commissioner) is a total dumbass and is a puppet of Texas for the most part.